Enforcing parallel individual cases as a bundle — with predictable fees and proven procedural structures.
Many legal violations affect not just an individual but a multitude of parallel cases. Pursuing each case on a stand-alone basis is often economically unattractive for the affected parties — the effort exceeds the realisable benefit.
By bundling structurally identical individual cases, scale effects emerge: standardised review, uniform pleadings, a fixed fee instead of hourly rates. The result is enforcement strength at a cost that remains predictable for every client.
Anyone who booked an online coaching programme whose provider lacks ZFU accreditation may demand full repayment under § 7 FernUSG — including business clients (BGH, 12 June 2025 – III ZR 109/24).
Mass proceedings emerge where systematic conduct harms many people in the same way. If you would like to bring a topic to our attention — whether as an affected party or as a representative of a stakeholder group — that may be suitable for bundled action, we welcome your description.
